
One problem and something journalist forget to mention is that revenue – costs = profit. Even though the show brought in $200 million in revenue if the cost is even $201 million then that would still be a loss. Lady Gaga’s financial and tour managers probably want don’t agree with what is going on. It is ironic because Lady Gaga would actually be better off not going on tour since she seems to become broke when she does them. Either that or she needs to cut the costs of costumes, expensive equipment, cut labor costs (dancers and backup singers). Even one of the most successful bands of all time U2 in their 360 tour spent $750,000 per day since they had private jets, a production crew of 137, and hired an additional 120 people. Although, U2 is doing 110 shows they are said not to break even until towards the end of the show despite grossing $558 million in tour sales.
My main point in all of this is just because you earn an incredible income doesn’t mean you will be rich. At the end of the day if your costs are more than what you are selling your good or services for then by definition you are not creating value. I wish more people in the music/Hollywood world would understand this concept.
No comments:
Post a Comment