Koch Update: Daycare Facility, David H. Koch Plaza, Newspapers, and New Wild Bill Koch Interview

So while I have been away it seems as if the Koch brothers have been making the headlines. One I forgot last year was David Koch made it finally possible for MIT researchers to have a daycare center that would double the size of the daycare facility population (providing daycare for 126 children) and will open in August 2013. Actually the whole idea came about when a post-doc woman was sitting next to David Koch at dinner one night and talked about the state of the daycare at MIT.

In another Koch related news David Koch donated $65 million to the groundbreaking ceremony video can be seen here (Koch makes some remarks at around the 1:26 mark). Construction won’t be done until the fall of 2014. I always wonder why liberals hate David and Charles Koch so much when they give to causes like the arts that liberals and the general public tend to enjoy.

Bill Koch has been in the news as well. Bloomberg had a story a few weeks ago discussing the false imprisonment suit. In probably one of the most bizarre Koch lawsuits to date former Oxbow employee Kirby Martensen claims he was held against his will. Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley dismissed the lawsuit Martensen brought however claimed that she didn’t buy Koch’s arguments. The case is being retried and the name is Martensen v. Koch.

In somewhat Koch Industries related news Daniel Fisher of Forbes had an excellent story (his writing is superb) on the Marshall family (who are still to this day part owners of Koch Industries) describing how J. Howard Marshall II (the guy married to Anna Nichole Smith) and his family are having a fight not between family members but also the IRS for gift taxes owed. Last year Bloomberg discovered through tax documents that Elaine Marshall owned 15% of Koch Industries which gave her a net worth of $12.7 billion. It is somewhat interesting that if a few court decisions had gone a certain way Anna Nichole Smith could have ended up with ownership of Koch Industries. Fisher discovered some great primary documents like this tax court document for J. Howard Marshall II.

The most recent news that has been talked about is Koch Industries maybe purchasing the L.A. Times. It would be interesting to see market based management journalism. First I really don’t know how true this rumor really is. Also newspapers have been a dying breed as revenue is at an all-time low (even after adjusting for inflation).  The Koch’s grandfather Frederick Koch did run a news paper in Quanah, Texas.  Speaking of Koch Industries I forgot to point out this article (again by superb journalist Daniel Fisher) which describes how Koch Industries reinvests 90% of their earnings into the company while correctly pointing out that both Charles and David may have issues down the road in terms of succession planning. With a net worth of $34 billion each and 84% ownership in Koch Industries it makes estate planning difficult even though Charles claims they have been doing estate planning for years. Actually the serious estate tax bill will come not when Charles and David pass on but when their wives pass on.

Lastly and maybe one of my favorite parts is that Bill Koch actually granted an interview (7 pages worth) to 5280 (a Denver magazine). It seems like Wild Bill is spending a lot of time on the ranch working out details. Koch seems to be putting forth a lot of effort in getting the history correct and everything historically accurate. The town will be intended to be a private getaway for him and his family. The goal of his town is to all have a place to come to as they grow older and have their own families. After decades of battles between Charles, David, and Bill I guess Bill has come to realize that fighting between family members really doesn’t lead to anything good.  Bill Koch’s twin brother David Koch apparently was interviewed too and admitted in his younger days he was more interested in the popular people on campus, the girls, and the athletes. David also said that Bill was the more serious student. Bill like his brothers David and Charles had to work on the ranch (beginning at age 13 and worked 12 hours a day, seven days a week). Bill in the interview also discusses the incident with Martensen and said Oxbow became aware in 2011 of possible misconduct by Martensen and through an internal investigation (e-mails, recordings, and over 4 million items in total) Martensen was planning a scheme. When confronted about the wrongdoings Martensen admitted to some of it. The whole ordeal sounds bizarre about detaining an employee and a trial, judge, and jury will have to decide the outcome. Toward the end of the interview Bill mentions he wants to live the rest of his life in peace, spend more time with his family, and hang out in his own town. The governor of Colorado would like Koch to open the town to high paying visitors and school children (Koch is unsure if this is the right move however how often will his family even “use” the city”?”

Bill Koch is probably one of the most interesting people I have ever read about. The Koch brothers are fascinating as well. Whatever side of the political spectrum one is on I think people can agree they are interesting, controversial, and I have learned so much from studying the history of the family. I can say one thing is for sure there probably will never be a family as interesting as this. 

The Case For A Simpler Tax Code

After studying the personal income tax code for a couple of years now I believe that the U.S. tax code is insanely inefficient, gives benefits to people that don’t need it, and ends costing taxpayers not only money but countless hours.

If you look at the tax code and just look at the deductions it is pretty easy to tell what things are deductions. Nearly everything that is a deduction is only a deduction because the government has made it expensive. Take for instance education costs and medical expenses (which are deductible). You never see deductions for things like cell phones, computers, or areas where the free market is involved. People can deduct interest on their home (which leads to bigger houses than we would otherwise have without the deduction).  The charitable deduction leads to people to give to charity, however as Dan Mitchell points out here that history shows that the deduction itself does not lead people to give more to charity since giving has historically been the same (even before the deduction was put into place). The charitable deduction generally benefits people with high income as they can deduct up to 50% of their (Adjusted Gross income). Also if property is donated to a charity over a certain amount it has to be appraised which requires more forms and paperwork.

What is really sad is that Social Security benefits are taxable. So essentially people are paying taxes Social Security taxes when they work and when they collect their benefits (double taxation).

Currently the tax code is 3.8 million words long (2010). Since 2001 there have been 4,428 changes to the tax law in addition to filling out 893 forms to fill out. The complexity of the tax code can be found in this Forbes article. According to this Laffer Center report the cost of tax compliance is $431.1 billion. I would think both parties would agree this is a waste of both time and money. The biggest problem I see is that the tax code makes it hard for even honest and decent people to figure how to file out their taxes. Many of the tax laws exist to benefit certain people while disadvantaging others. Did you know for instance if you rental out a home less than 14 days per year you don’t have to report it as income. This actually came about because during the Masters Golf tournament and Atlanta summer Olympics politicians and others would rent their homes out to people and didn’t want to have to pay tax on it so they created a tax law saying you didn’t have to. 

What is strange is that let's say you invest in a stock and when you sell the stock it is worth less than you paid for it. This loss can be used to reduce your taxes. It seems troubling/odd that the government is giving investors a benefit for investing unwisely. However, the maximum amount is only $3,000 per year.

 The IRS seems to be proud of answering 68% of calls in 2012 (average wait time was 17 minutes). If a private business took 17 minutes to answer phone calls they would be out of business. Part of the reason why so many people call the IRS is because the tax code is pretty darn complicated.

Many people have an interest in the tax code being complicated. Upon a little research I discovered that there are around 1.2 million accountants (this includes auditors as well). 68,000 professional financial planners, tax accountants, and other professionals that have a direct interest in the complexity of the tax law. Also there are other indirect professions that are related to the tax code such as home relators (mortgage interest deduction), insurance industry, and others.

The opportunity costs is not only 6.1 billion hours for the people that do taxes but the amount of useless knowledge accountants, financial planners, and tax attorneys are required to know adds little value. If we had a flat tax they wouldn't be required to remember so much nonsense and could be free to add value in other ways. 

The Case For More Nurses and Physician Assistants

With much people still talking about healthcare reform I thought there was one area thing people were not talking about: nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs). I see both of these professions doing mountains of paperwork and it seems as if they are not being put to their highest valued use: helping and serving patients. States like Texas nurses practitioners are required to have a doctor sign off on 10% of the charts. However, 34 states don’t have this requirement. Not only does this waste time for the nurse practitioner but also takes time away from the doctor who is trying to help patients. There is an expected shortage of doctors (expected to grow to 130,000 by 2025) however there are some issues with this.  Why not add 155,000 nurse practitioners and over 83,000 physician assistants? So let’s assume that only 90% of nurse practitioners and physicians assistants are working with patients. If they on average see 8 patients a day that means 1.7 million more people per day could see a medical professional! Every week that would be close to 11.99 million who would have access to someone who could help them.

Much of the criticism comes from people who say things like “Nurse practitioners and physicians are not as qualified as doctors”. Sometimes things that seem true are not true once you look at the evidence. What is fascinating is this article in The Journal of the American Medical Association from January 2000 entitled “Primary Care Outcomes in Patients Treated by Nurse Practitioners or Physicians a Randomized Trial” the study concluded that even when patients were randomly assigned to either a nurse practitioner or doctor the outcomes were comparable. What is even more fascinating is that the patients with hypertension did better under the care of the nurse practitioners than doctors.

Perhaps the real icing on the cake is that the American Medical Association would publish this considering it has a vested interest no one other than doctors see patients. A 2000 RAND study found no evidence that nurses provided lower quality care than their counterparts and actually could reduce office visits by 35%. This case study showed that in the late 1990's when nurse practitioners were introduced to Loyola University for their cardiovascular program the mortality rate decrease from 3% to .9% in only 4 years, complication rates decreased, and the costs also decreased. This study in a 2 year follow up found that there was no difference between the care physicians provided and that of nurses. This study showed that nurses and PAs provided similar care as HIV experts and even better care than non-HIV experts.

Women’s right activists should embrace more this since nurses make up 92% of all nurses. By giving the women in this field more responsibilities it will increase their pay which I see as positive. The elitist view view that only doctors can help people is such utter nonsense.  Medical information is more dispersed now than ever before. States and the AMA should allow nurse practitioners and physician assistants to provide care. As I mentioned the level of care is similar to that of a physician, healthcare costs would be reduced, statistically speaking women would be given more responsibilities and in turn make more money. I see all of these things as positive. The only people who wouldn’t like this are people who would have to compete with these “new” medical professionals. 

Forbes 400: Charles and David Koch & Historical Net Worth 1984-2013

(This graph shows net worth over time with net worth of each of the Koch brothers) 

Recently, Forbes came out with the richest people in America.  As some of you may know I have covered Charles Koch Relentless Goals here. If you want to see all the Koch articles I have done over the years you can go here.  Charles Koch and David Koch were on the list again this year (from looking at the top 10 of this list seem to be the only ones that believe in free markets). Their net worth increased to $34 billion from $31 billion last year (only a 9% increase while the overall stock market did a little better).  What is interesting is that what may explain why the Koch brothers are so rich is that they do take on more risk. The technical term is standard deviation which just simply means how much things deviate from the normal. When I looked at the standard deviation of their net worth it was 44%. The long run standard deviation on stocks is less than half of this. The compound annual return of the Koch brothers is 16.2% which decreased from last year. If things continue on this pace the Koch brothers would be worth $100 billion (each) by 2020. Of course by this time Charles would be 85 and David would be 80. Personally, I enjoy following the Koch brothers as I believe they are true American heroes building a successful company with 60,000 employees creating products that every day products people use from nylon, beef, paper products, and even drinking water. Truly, this is a company that is diversified and not simply in oil as many claim. The only way the Koch brothers got rich was as Dr. Walter E. Williams would say “serving their fellow man/woman”. Consumers were not forced into buying all these products Koch makes. People voluntarily decided “well Koch makes a better product at a lower price than the rest of the competition let me give them my money”. Koch practice something called market based management (MBM) which I discussed on this post. MBM really does seem to work for Koch Industries and I wonder if other companies have used it.