Today
in the Wall Street Journal op-ed section was an article
by Charles Koch about crony capitalism. As you may know I did an extensive
three part series on the Kochs here,
here,
and here.
The
main gist of the article is that Charles Koch opposes crony capitalism and
doesn’t want the government to come help him out (too bad more business leaders
are not like this). People on the left claim that Koch Industries takes
subsidies from the government but their arguments are shaky at best. Let’s
examine some of their claims. The first claim is that Fred Koch (father of
Charles) helped construct refineries for Joesph Stalin. What they don’t explain
is how free market the father became after realizing how communism didn’t work
in the former Soviet Union. Also even though no one is fond of Stalin I am not
sure how the U.S. government is subsidzing this. Another claim is that Koch is
trying to lobby politicians by making campaign contributions and then in return
the politicians will help out the business. Koch has been against subsidies
like the NAT Gas Act, against ethanol subsidies (which actually increase the
price of food), and alternative energy subsidies. You could take away all of
these subsidies and Koch Industries would be just fine. Also sometimes the
government forces companies into taking subsidies even when they don’t want
them (giving banks money in 2008 that were financially stable). This is like
when people claim that oil companies get subsidies. This of course is nonsense since
oil companies get no unique tax credits or deductions. In fact in 2005 when oil
company CEOs were called in front of Congress about “excessive profits” each
executive said these so called subsidies wouldn’t make a difference in their
bottom line because it doesn’t even apply to them.
Charles
and David Koch believe in free markets which is actually against their self
interest which so many people fail to
point out. They want free markets not to make them rich but to make everyone else
rich while enhancing the standard of living for everyone. Liberals often say
the Koch brothers just want to pollute to make more money. My question would be
do Charles and David Koch breath different air then everyone else? Also if
these accusations of pollution were as true as so many claim why wouldn’t there
would be criminal action against Koch Industries? Yes, the company has had
incidents were sometimes bad things go wrong. However, when you are operating a
company with over 60,000 employees dealing with chemicals that are not so
friendly bad stuff can and will happen. The question is what trade off are
people willing to accept. We could have so much regulation that gasoline would
cost $6 at the tank in order to be safe, however how many people could be able
to afford to go to work every day? I would argue the Koch brothers have done
more to increase standard of living than politicians by giving people a place
to go every day to earn a living, a place to help them pay bills, a place to
give them purpose, and most importantly a place to create value. If you know if
any welfare problems that have similar results without taxpayer money please
let me know.
No comments:
Post a Comment